Consumer Forum

Consumer Information

  • Clear and Practical Consumer Advice
  •  
  •  
Consumer Direct

Support Us About Us Bookmark and Share

Go Back   Consumer Forum > News and Announcements > Consumer News

Consumer News News items of interest to UK consumers.


Menu
Support us - get full forum membership

Find What Consumer on Facebook

Follow What Consumer on Twitter




 
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 4th October 2008, 01:39 PM
Senior Consumer Activist
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Birkenhead
Posts: 364
Thanks: 16
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Blog Entries: 6
Jorumian is on a distinguished road
Default Financial expert assistance required!

As we have all heard, the American governments bill to buy up £700bn of "bad debt" to restore confidence in the banking sector, has, at the second attempt, been ratified to the statute books via congress and the house of representatives, and is now law.

I am really not au fait with how finance on this scale works. But I am confused because this is what it appears to me to be like... And yes this may be staggeringly naive, but this is why I require someone wise and learned in the ways of the finance, to explain to me.

As I understand it, the £700bn of "toxic" debt has been caused by money lenders (banks predominantly) loaning too much money in the form of mortgages mainly for what they can cover and sustain over a given period.

So in effect this is around £700bn (or a proportion of this money) of mortgage debt across the US (and probably in other countries too).

So if the government is using PUBLIC money to pay off this debt. Why does this not therefore mean that everyone whose mortgage is part of this "toxic" debt? has therefore paid for their house? After all, their taxes are being used to cover this debt?

Alternatively, does this mean that all the houses involved in this debt, are now the property of the Government? Are many millions of Americans now inclined to offer to put up George W, Laura and his dog for the night free of charge?

Because to a very confused person as I am... It seems to me that the banks have received the money back that they have overspent themselves. And are now going to receive it back once again in repayments from everyone else. If this is the case... Does it not mean that people are in effect paying TWICE for their house, and the banks will in time receive double the value of the money they rather stupidly lent in the first place?

I am sure there is a financial expert guffawing heartily at my brazen naivety here. Therefore I ask to be enlightened!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The information on this website does not constitute professional advice. Advice is taken at your own risk.
Contact Us - UK Consumer Forum - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - Consumer Rights

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright Meanwhile Media Ltd 2008